NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Victory v R [2017] NSWCCA 286 Hearing dates: 21 November 2017 Date of orders: 30 November 2017 Decision date: 30 November 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Davies J at [50]; Adamson J at [51] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE APPEAL – exposing child to process of cultivation of a prohibited plant namely cannabis – whether it was open to the sentencing judge to find that the applicant was a principal in the offending – discussion of relevant evidence – whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance as a result of the sentence imposed on the co-offender – sentence appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – s 10A, s 12 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5(1)(c) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – s 23A(2), s 36(Y)(1) Cases Cited: PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bradley Dennis Victory – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr D Randle – Applicant Mr F Veltro – Respondent Crown
Solicitors: A Cooney – Applicant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2014/149174 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 16 October 2016 Before: Hanley SC DCJ File Number(s): 2014/149174
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate