NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CPJ v The University of Newcastle [2017] NSWCATAD 350 Hearing dates: 15 November 2017 Date of orders: 29 November 2017 Decision date: 29 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: 1. The application to set aside the summons is granted. 2. The proceedings are listed for directions on 5 December 2017 at 9.30 am. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – summons to produce documents – where applicant in proceedings under the Privacy Information Protection Act 1998 issued a summons to a third party to produce documents – whether summons has legitimate forensic purpose – taking into account common law principles and the guiding principle, whether summons should be set aside Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 36(1), s 37, s 48 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW), s 18, s 52, s 55, Cases Cited: Becwell Legal Services Pty Ltd v McMaster [2011] FCA 1501 Casley-Smith v District Council of Stirling (1989) 51 SASR 447 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 EQ and Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (Freedom of information) [2016] AATA 785 FM v Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University [2003] NSWADT 78 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 March v Stramare (E and MH) Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; (1991) 171 CLR 506 National Employers' Mutual General Assn Ltd v Waind [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 NW v New South Wales Fire Brigades (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 61 Portal Software v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1115 Sharpe v Grobbel [2017] NSWSC 1065 Texts Cited: Neil Rees, Simon Rice, Dominique Allen, Australian Anti-Discrimination Law, (2nd ed 2014, Federation Press) Bernard Cairns, Australian Civil Procedure, Thomson Reuters (10th ed 2014) at 585 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: CPJ (Applicant) The University of Newcastle (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Kemp Strang Lawyers (Applicant) Hicksons Lawyers (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate