NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McKell v R [2017] NSWCCA 291 Hearing dates: 15 September 2017 Decision date: 08 December 2017 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Beech-Jones J at [103]; Fagan J at [141] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – conviction – importing a commercial quantity of a border-controlled precursor intended or believed to be for manufacture of a border controlled drug – conspiring to import a commercial quantity of a border-controlled drug – dealing with money to the value of $100,000 or more believing it to be the proceeds of crime – whether trial judge's summing up caused a miscarriage of justice – whether summing up unbalanced or unfair Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahern v R (1988) 165 CLR 87; [1988] HCA 39 AW v R [2016] NSWCCA 227 B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599; [1992] HCA 68 Broadhurst v The Queen [1964] AC 441 at 464 Domican v The Queen (1991-1992) 173 CLR 555 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193; [1993] HCA 63 Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Majok v R [2015] NSWCCA 160 R v Jamal (2008) 72 NSWLR 258; [2008] NSWCCA 177 Tootle v R [2017] NSWCCA 103 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Troy McKell (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: D Jordan SC (Appellant) L Crowley (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate