NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gair v Greenwood [2017] NSWSC 1652 Hearing dates: 20 October 2017 Decision date: 30 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Defence of truth in respect of imputations 7(a), 7(b) and 9(b) struck out; contextual imputations (ii) and (iv) struck out Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – justification – capacity of particulars to prove substantial truth of specific imputations
DEFAMATION – defences – contextual truth – whether contextual imputations capable of being conveyed in addition to plaintiff's imputations – whether matter complained of capable of conveying contextual imputations – undesirability of determining question of capacity to convey in respect of an audio-visual publication where the matter complained of was not tendered at the hearing Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 60 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26, 31, 33 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), ss 449 and 451 Cases Cited: Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1331 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Zeccola (2015) 91 NSWLR 341; [2015] NSWCA 329 Hayson v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 376 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Thomas Duncan Gair (first plaintiff) Garry Maurice Turland (second plaintiff) Adam Haig Greenwood (defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Woods (plaintiffs) S Chrysanthou (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate