NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Joukhador v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWSC 1653 Hearing dates: 10 October 2017 Decision date: 10 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application to vacate hearing date refused Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – access to documents – claim for public interest immunity – ongoing investigation
CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to vacate hearing date – importance of using allocated hearing dates where practicable Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 93T, 192E(1)(b) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104; [1990] HCA 26 Joukhador as Principal Solicitor of Thomas Booler Lawyers v New South Wales Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWSC 1287 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Marcel Joukhador (plaintiff) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (first defendant) Daniel Opdam (second defendant) Stephen Lister (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Batley (plaintiff) P Singleton (first and second defendants)
Solicitors: Hearn Legal (plaintiff) Henry Davis York (defendants) File Number(s): 2017/151403 Publication restriction: This judgment will not be published on Caselaw pending conclusion of the criminal proceedings against the plaintiff.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate