NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kaddour v R [2017] NSWCCA 294 Hearing dates: 24 November 2017 Date of orders: 01 December 2017 Decision date: 01 December 2017 Before: Leeming JA [1]; Fullerton J [12]; Adamson J [13] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – whether offending on parole erroneously taken into account on assessment of objective seriousness – HELD – no error demonstrated – sentencing judge adopted sequence of relevant matters submitted by parties – finding of objective seriousness preceded mention of fact that offence committed while applicant on conditional liberty – need to read reasons fairly and as a whole Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 54B Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 24, 26 Cases Cited: Boney v R [2015] NSWCCA 291 C G Maloney Pty Ltd v Noon [2011] NSWCA 397 Chiro v The Queen [2017] HCA 37 Commonwealth v Bank of New South Wales (1949) 79 CLR 497 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Osborne v R; R v Osborne [2017] NSWCCA 11 Sharma v R [2017] NSWCCA 85 Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57; 79 ALJR 1816 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kalid Kaddour (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Lloyd QC (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate