NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Apokis v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 163 Hearing dates: 5, 8 to 12, 15 and 16 May and 18 to 20 July 2017 Date of orders: 04 December 2017 Decision date: 04 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Moore J Decision: See conclusion at [249] and directions at [251] Catchwords: RESUMPTION COMPENSATION - original landholding bisected by the Pacific Highway Upgrade Project - RMS acquisition of strip for new highway project - consideration of uses in the before-and-"after" scenario - quarry located at northern end - potential for "bush block" residential use at southern end in before-and-"after" scenario - compensable difference in value arising - compensation for acquired strip determined at $113,000 - potential for quarry continuation in "after" scenario - no effective difference of potential quarry value in the "after" scenario - quarry value compensation of $1,000 awarded RESUMPTION COMPENSATION - RMS excavates substantial volume of material from acquired strip for use for construction of the Pacific Highway Upgrade Project - claim that the RMS should pay royalties to the Applicant for extracted material - RMS acquisition vested RMS with right to all aspects of the acquired land (including quarrying materials in it) - no basis for compensation for royalties - consideration of the future life of the existing quarry results (if royalties were claimable) in a net present value of royalties for the RMS extracted material being zero Legislation Cited: Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983, s 36 Coffs Harbour Local Environmental Plan 2013 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, Sch 3(19)(1)(a) Crown Lands Act 1989, s 34A Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, ss 47, 55, 56 and 59(1)(f) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 37 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Cases Cited: George D Angus Pty Limited v Health Administration Corporation (2013) 205 LGERA 357; [2013] NSWLEC 212 Environment Protection Authority v Wyanga Holdings Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Cauchi [2015] NSWLEC 78 Ryde Municipal Council v Royal Ryde Homes [1970] 1 NSWR 277; (1970) 91 WN (NSW) 440; (1970) 19 LGRA 321 Sydney Water Corporation v Caruso [2009] NSWCA 391 Tolson v Roads and Maritime Services (2014) 201 LGERA 367; [2014] NSWCA 161 Vaughan-Taylor v David Mitchell-Melcann Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 580 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sam Apokis (Applicant) Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Hemmings SC/Mr S Nash and Mr D Beaufils, barristers (Applicant) Mr P Tomasetti SC/Mr N Eastman, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate