NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Breen v Clough [2017] NSWSC 1681 Hearing dates: 9-12, 16 October 2017 Date of orders: 05 December 2017 Decision date: 05 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: See paragraphs [259] and [273]. Catchwords: LAND LAW – easements – substantial interference with rights under easements – where neighbouring properties have reciprocal benefits and burdens under easement to enable shared use of inclinator – where inclinator registered in defendant's name with regulator – regulator issued notices requiring works to be done to inclinator – whether defendant's conduct in response to notices constituted a substantial interference with the plaintiffs' rights under the easement
LAND LAW – easements – substantial interference with rights under easements – remedies for interference – damages – damages awarded due to inability to use storeroom landing of inclinator – damage for expenses and inconvenience – exemplary damages claimed – exemplary damages not warranted
LAND LAW – easements – construction of easements – general principles of construction – where easement incorporates statutory terms of right of access – where easement imposes obligation to "ensure proper maintenance, repair and replacement" – consideration of parties' rights and obligations under easement
EQUITY – equitable remedies – injunctions – plaintiffs seek a range of injunctions against defendant in relation to easement for inclinator – appropriate to order mandatory injunctions requiring replacement of fence with gate, provision of keys, and relocation of control buttons for inclinator Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 181A, Sch 8 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW), ss 91, 135, Pt 6 Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 2001 (NSW), cll 83, 113 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), Sch 1, cll 3-6, Sch 4, cll 4, 8 Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (NSW), Sch 18B, cl 31 Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017 (NSW), cll 10(1B), 246, Sch 5, Pt 2 Cases Cited: Butler v Muddle (1995) 6 BPR 97,532 Hare v van Brugge (2013) 84 NSWLR 41; [2013] NSWCA 74 Owners of Strata Plan 48754 v Anderson (1999) 9 BPR 17,119; [1999] NSWSC 580 Powell v Langdon (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 136 Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman [1915] AC 634 Sertari Pty Ltd v Nirimba Developments Pty Ltd (2008) NSW ConvR 56-200; [2007] NSWCA 324 Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 528; [2007] HCA 45 Zenere v Leate (1980) 1 BPR 97,029 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Douglas Martin Breen (First Plaintiff) Tracey Jane Dillon (Second Plaintiff) Christine Mae Clough (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Ireland with Ms T Davy (Plaintiffs) Mr D O'Connor with Ms F McNeil (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate