NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dixon v R [2017] NSWCCA 299 Hearing dates: 4 September 2017 Decision date: 15 December 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; McCallum J at [30]; Wilson J at [124] Decision: (1) As to ground 1, leave under r 4 refused.
(2) As to grounds 2 and 3, leave to appeal granted.
(3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against conviction – where defence counsel opened to the jury that the accused would give evidence – where accused did not give evidence – whether combination of those events resulted in a miscarriage of justice – alleged incompetence of defence counsel in failing to seek a discharge of the jury or a specific direction – whether miscarriage of justice
CRIME – appeal against conviction – obligation of trial judge to put fairly before the jury defence case – short trial run on single issue of complainant's credibility – whether judge obliged to summarise submissions – whether miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 66A(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 161 Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Cases Cited: AP v R [2013] NSWCCA 189 Aravena v R (2015) 91 NSWLR 258; [2015] NSWCCA 288 Castle v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 449; [2016] HCA 46 Domican v R (1992) 173 CLR 555; [1992] HCA 13 Maraache v R [2013] NSWCCA 199 R v Davis [1999] NSWCCA 15 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 RR v R [2011] NSWCCA 235 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Williams v R (1999) 104 A Crim R 260; [1999] NSWCCA 9 Wong v R [2009] NSWCCA 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edward Michael Dixon (appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: C Wasley (appellant) E Balodis (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate