NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Terra Ag Services Pty Limited v Griffith City Council [2017] NSWLEC 167 Hearing dates: 30 November 2017 Date of orders: 07 December 2017 Decision date: 07 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: The Court orders: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) The decision and orders of Senior Commissioner Martin of 6 July 2017 are set aside. (3) The proceedings are remitted to be determined according to law. (4) The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against a Commissioner's decision on questions of law – refusal of development consent for rural supplies business – part of development held to be for prohibited purpose of "heavy industrial storage establishment" – whether development for one or more purposes – acceptance that development for more than one purpose – failure to characterise development as a whole – constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction to determine and give reasons for finding that development not for sole purpose of "rural supplies" – constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction to determine whether use for heavy industrial storage establishment subservient to use for rural supplies – constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction to determine and give reasons for finding whether part of development met each element of definition of "heavy industrial storage establishment" – not established that wrong test applied in determining whether goods or materials needed separation from other development – construction of definition of "heavy industrial storage establishment" – no error in not construing by reference to name of development being defined – no error in construction of phrase "for commercial purposes" because phrase not construed at all – construction of zone objectives – error in having regard to objectives of zone in characterising the purpose of development Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A(1) Griffith Local Environmental Plan 2014 Cases Cited: Abret Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council (2011) 180 LGERA 343; [2011] NSWCA 107 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v O'Donnell (1990) 69 LGRA 404 Beale v GIO of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd (2013) 201 LGERA 116; [2013] NSWLEC 147 Chamwell v Strathfield Council (2007) 151 LGERA 400; [2007] NSWLEC 114 Cheetham v Goulburn Motorcycle Club Inc (2017) 223 LGERA 43; [2017] NSWCA 83 Cranbrook School v Woollahra Municipal Council (2006) 66 NSWLR 379; [2006] NSWCA 155 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Dick (2007) 226 FLR 388; [2007] NSWCA 190 El Boustani v Minister administering Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (2014) 199 LGERA 198; [2014] NSWCA 33 Foodbarn Pty Ltd v Solicitor-General (1975) 32 LGRA 157 Housing Commission of NSW v Tatmar Pastoral Co Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 Kovacevic v Queanbeyan City Council [2016] NSWCA 346 Matic v Mid-Western Regional Council [2008] NSWLEC 113 Mike George Planning Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 3) [2014] NSWLEC 123 Newcastle City Council v Royal Newcastle Hospital (1957) 96 CLR 493; [1957] HCA 15 People for the Plains Inc v Santos NSW (Eastern) Pty Ltd (2017) 220 LGERA 181; [2017] NSWCA 46 Shire of Perth v O'Keefe (1964) 110 CLR 529; [1964] HCA 37 Tovir Investments Pty Ltd v Waverly Council [2014] NSWCA 379 Wacal Developments Pty Ltd v Realty Pty Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 503; [1978] HCA 30 Texts Cited: Herzfeld, Prince and Tully, Interpretation and Use of Legal Sources – The Laws of Australia (2013, Thomson Reuters) Pearce and Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (2004, 8th ed, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Terra Ag Services Pty Limited (Applicant) Griffith City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Pickles SC and Dr S Berveling (Applicant) Mr J Lazarus (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate