NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Yavuz (No. 2) [2017] NSWSC 1705 Hearing dates: 5 December 2017 Date of orders: 05 December 2017 Decision date: 08 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Davies J Decision: 1. Reject the tender by the Crown of the triple 0 call made by Youness Elmbradt.
2. Jury discharged. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – criminal law – credibility – exceptions to the credibility rule - re-establishing credibility – eye witness to the killing of the deceased – witness makes triple 0 call – triple 0 call not disclosed by Crown until after witness's evidence completed – challenge to witness's credibility in cross-examination – tender of triple 0 call under s 108(3)(b) of the Evidence Act – whether it was asserted or implied that witness's evidence fabricated – significant probative value of triple 0 call - requirements of s 108(3) established – whether tender would be unfairly prejudicial to accused – whether probative value outweighed by unfair prejudice
CRIMINAL LAW – procedure – juries – whether jury should be discharged after rejection of tendered evidence – seriousness of charge – unfairness to accused – balancing exercise Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown John Can Yavuz (Accused) Representation: Counsel: N Williams (Crown) S Littlemore QC & L Bewsher (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Matouk Joyner Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2015/335208
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate