NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hunt v R [2017] NSWCCA 305 Hearing dates: 9 October 2017 Decision date: 08 December 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Adamson J at [20]; Bellew J at [83] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal.
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – alleged non-compliance with s 44(2A) of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) by pronouncing non-parole period first – error purely technical and of no operative effect or practical significance
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – legislative history of s 44(2A) – significance of order in which components of sentence pronounced – formal requirement that aggregate sentence be pronounced first
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – alleged failure to regard applicant's temporary mental illness as a significant mitigating factor – weight to be given to factors to be determined by sentencing judge – no error demonstrated Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 44, 45, 48, 50, 53A, 54B; Pt 4, Div 1 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61, 93GA, 114, Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 7, 36 Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW), s 5 Cases Cited: Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Forst (1940) 64 CLR 538 Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Director of Public Prosecutions v Darcy-Shillingsworth [2017] NSWCCA 224 Eid v R [2008] NSWCCA 255 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Musgrove v R [2007] NSWCCA 21; (2007) A Crim R 424 Ngati v R [2014] NSWCCA 125 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v GDR (1994) 35 NSWLR 376 R v Gower (1991) 56 A Crim R 115 R v Hampton (1998) 44 NSWLR 729 R v Smith [2005] NSWCCA 19 The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; (2016) 91 ALJR 131 Wilmot v R [2007] NSWCCA 278 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 23 November 2010, 27866-27871 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dennis Henry Hunt (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC/A Bonnor (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate