NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 v Sharkey [2017] NSWCA 319 Hearing dates: 8 August 2017 Decision date: 11 December 2017 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; White JA at [46]; Emmett AJA at [57] Decision: 1. Grant the applicant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. Applicant/appellant pay the respondent's costs of the application for leave and of the appeal. Catchwords: WATER – water access licences – where licence entitlement to take water from Murray River under repealed Water Act 1912 (NSW) converted to access licence under Water Management Act 2000 (NSW) – where access licence category to which entitlement converted dependent on whether 1912 Act licence permitted taking of water from "regulated" or "unregulated" part of river under the 2000 Act – Murray River relevantly "regulated" downstream from "the upper limit of the storage of Hume Dam"
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – ordinary and natural meaning of "the upper limit of the storage of Hume Dam" – whether practical considerations justify departure Legislation Cited: Water Act 1912 (NSW) Water Management Act 2000 (NSW) Cases Cited: Gill v Donald Humberstone & Co Ltd [1963] 3 All ER 180 Wingecarribee Shire Council v De Angelis [2016] NSWCA 189 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 (Applicant) Clive Conrad Sharkey (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: PD Herzfeld and M Sherman (Applicant) In person (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate