NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: DM & Longbow Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWLEC 173 Hearing dates: 11 December 2017 Date of orders: 11 December 2017 Decision date: 11 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: The Court orders: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against a Commissioner's decision on a question of law – proposed strata subdivision of a proposed dual occupancy – development standard fixing minimum subdivision lot size – proposed subdivision will result in lots less than minimum size – development standard does not apply to "subdivision of individual lots in a strata plan" – whether proposed subdivision is such a subdivision – proposed subdivision of Torrens title lot into individual lots by registration of a plan as a strata plan – not subdivision of individual lots in a strata plan – development standard applicable to proposed subdivision Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4B, 79C, 97 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A(1) Real Property Act 1900 Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 s 4(1) Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 s 5(5) Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 cll 2.3, 2.6, 4.1, 4.1A, 4.1B, 4.1C, 4.6 Cases Cited: 4Nature Inc v Centennial Springvale Pty Ltd (2017) 224 LGERA 301; [2017] NSWCA 191 Calleja v Botany Bay City Council (2005) 142 LGERA 104; [2005] NSWCA 337 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert (1996) 186 CLR 389; [1996] HCA 36 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297; [1981] HCA 26 Cranbrook School v Woollahra Municipal Council (2006) 66 NSWLR 379; [2006] NSWCA 155 Flower v Land Cover Council [2017] NSWLEC 1135 FTD Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 1061 Tovir Investments Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 379 Category: Principal judgment Parties: DM & Longbow Pty Ltd (Applicant) Willoughby City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Berglund (Applicant) S Nash (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate