NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Robinson v R [2017] NSWCCA 315 Hearing dates: 17 November 2017 Decision date: 15 December 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Wilson J at [66] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Leave to appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – high degree of assistance to authorities – discount of 20% for assistance – total combined discount 45% for assistance and guilty plea – whether discount for assistance sufficient – limit in s 23(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – discount discretionary assessment – no error
CRIME – appeal against sentence – specially aggravated enter dwelling with intend to commit robbery in company – specially aggravated break, enter and commit robbery in company – manifest excess – use of comparable cases – no meaningful range to be found – sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 111(3), 112(3) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 23, 44(2) Cases Cited: Aslett v R [2012] NSWCCA 235 Burrows v R [2017] NSWCCA 45 De Jong v R; Tuimaualuga v R; Zechel v R; Puru v R [2015] NSWCCA 32; 249 A Crim R 252 Haouchar v R [2014] NSWCCA 227 Harper v R [2017] NSWCCA 159 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Hutchinson v R [2014] NSWCCA 317 LB v R [2013] NSWCCA 70 Micklesson v R [2009] NSWCCA 61 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 120 Palijan v R [2010] NSWCCA 142 Panetta v R [2016] NSWCCA 85 R v Baghdadi [2008] NSWCCA 239 R v Campbell [2014] NSWCCA 102 R v Chaaban [2006] NSWCCA 107 R v Cheh [2009] NSWCCA 134 R v Dole; R v Nguyen [2010] NSWCCA 101 R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38; 219 A Crim R 415 R v Elmir; R v Salami [2003] NSWCCA 192 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Lenati [2008] NSWCCA 67 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92; 172 A Crim R 151 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 Sheen v R [2011] NSWCCA 259; 215 A Crim R 208 SL v R [2015] NSWCCA 30; 249 A Crim R 295 Srikantharajah v R [2012] NSWCCA 209 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Z v R [2014] NSWCCA 323 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robinson (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Watts (Applicant) Mr N Adams (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate