NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Wilson (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 1730 Hearing dates: 27 November 2017, 28 November 2017, 30 November 2017, 1 December 2017, 4 December 2017, 5 December 2017 and 6 December 2017 Date of orders: 13 December 2017 Decision date: 13 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: On the limited evidence available, Ms Wilson is not guilty of murder, but guilty of manslaughter. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – special hearing under Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 – murder – judge alone – alternative charge of manslaughter – accused suffering mental impairment – whether accused intended to seriously injure victim when she hit him with a metal pole – how numerous burns were caused –– whether victim was struck before he was burnt by boiling water – self-defence – provocation – partial defence of substantial impairment by abnormality of mind – verdict – on the limited evidence available accused not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hawkins v R (1994) 179 CLR 500; [1994] HCA 28 Mizzi v R (1960) 105 CLR 659; [1960] HCA 77
R v M'Naghten (1843) 8 ER 718; [1843 - 60] All ER 229; R v Porter (1933) 55 CLR 182; [1933] HCA 1 R v Wilson (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 1680 Stingel v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 312; [1990] HCA 61 Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158 at 167; [1986] HCA 76 Wilson v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 313; [1992] HCA 31 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Pearl Marie Wilson Representation: Counsel: Ms K Ratcliffe (Crown) Mr P McGrath SC (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate