Yun v R [2017] NSWCCA 317

Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Yun v R [2017] NSWCCA 317 Hearing dates: 27 October 2017 Date of orders: 15 December 2017 Decision date: 15 December 2017 Before: Latham J at [1] Bellew J at [1] Campbell J at [49] Decision: The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Asserted Muldrock error – Whether sentencing Court erroneously applied the decision in R v Way – Whether error evidence from the arithmetical neatness of the sentence imposed

CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Asserted Mudrock error – Whether sentencing Court erred in taking into account matters personal to the appellant when assessing the objective seriousness of the offending – Whether a distinction is to be drawn in this respect between an assessment of objective seriousness of an offence to which a standard non-parole period applies, and an assessment of objective seriousness of every other offence Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Non-Parole Periods) Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Apps v R [2006] NSWCCA 290 Aytugrul v R [2015] NSWCCA 139 Ayshow v R [2011] NSWCCA 240 Application by Gil Bum Yun pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 824 Badans v R [2012] NSWCCA 97 Biddle v R [2017] NSWCCA 128 Bolt v R [2012] NSWCCA 50 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 221; (2015) 324 ALR 562 Carlton v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 244; (2008) 189 A Crim R 332 Cherdchoochatri v R [2013] NSWCCA 118 Davis v R [2015] NSWCCA 90 Further Application by Gil Bum Yun pursuant to s. 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2017] NSWSC 825 Giang v R [2017] NSWCCA 25 GN v R [2012] NSWCCA 96 Kuti v R [2012] NSWCCA 43 Lindsay v R [2012] NSWCCA 124 MDZ v R [2011] NSWCCA 243 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Maxwell v R [2007] NSWCCA 304 Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Munda v Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 R v Ainsworth (1994) 76 A Crim R 127 R v Campbell [2014] NSWCCA 102 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; (1999) 106 A Crim R 149 R v Holton [2004] NSWCCA 214 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 R v Way [2004] 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 131 RCW v R (No. 2) [2014] NSWCCA 190; (2014) 244 A Crim R 541 SKA v R; R v SKA [2009] NSWCCA 186 Subramaniam v R [2013] NSWCCA 159 Tiknius v R [2011] NSWCCA 215; (2011) 221 A Crim R 365 Ukropina v R [2016] NSWCCA 277 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49 Yun v R [2008] NSWCCA 114; (2008) 185 A Crim R 58 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gil Bum Yun – appellant Regina – respondent Representation: Counsel: J Roy – appellant M Cinque SC – respondent