NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CF v R [2017] NSWCCA 318 Hearing dates: 8 November 2017 Decision date: 13 December 2017 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Rothman J at [109] Hamill J at [110] Decision: (1) Extend time for filing the notice of application for leave to appeal.
(2) With respect to the appeal against conviction, grant leave to rely upon ground 1 pursuant to Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4.
(3) Appeal against conviction dismissed.
(4) Grant leave to appeal against sentence.
(5) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – procedure – whether appropriate to grant leave under Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 – whether provision of video and audio recordings of complainant's evidence to jury during deliberations constituted a miscarriage of justice – where applicant led positive defence case at trial – whether danger that jury would give disproportionate weight to the complainant's recorded evidence – where warning given to the jury – where applicant's trial counsel did not object or seek redirection.
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – whether sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 3(1), 61M(2), 66C(1), 66M(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A(2)(eb) and (k), 53A(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 306A, 306B, 306E, 306F, 306G, 306H, 306I, 306J, 306K, 306L, 306M(1), 306P(1), 306S, 306U, 306V, 306X, 306Z, 306ZI, Divs 3 and 4, Pt 5, Ch 6 Criminal Procedure Amendment (Sexual and Other Offences) Act 1986 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Amendment (Vulnerable Persons) Act 2007 (NSW), Pt 6 Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Evidence Act 1995 Evidence (Children) Act 1997 (NSW), ss 6, 14, 25 Cases Cited: Gately v The Queen (2007) 232 CLR 208; [2007] HCA 55 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Jarrett v R (2014) 86 NSWLR 623; [2014] NSWCA 140 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Button (2002) 54 NSWLR 455; [2001] NSWCCA 159 R v Michael Anthony Ryan (No 7) [2012] NSWSC 1160 R v NZ (2005) 63 NSWLR 628; [2005] NSWCCA 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CF (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Stratton SC / Mr J Trevallion and Mr R Armitage (Applicant) Ms B Baker (Respondent Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate