NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Primrose v NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet [2017] NSWCATAD 366 Hearing dates: 24 November 2017 Date of orders: 14 December 2017 Decision date: 14 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R C Titterton, Principal Member Decision: (1) The decision under review is affirmed.
(2) Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, paragraphs [34] to [42] of these reasons are not to be published.
(3) Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, any confidential evidence filed with the Tribunal or given in a confidential hearing pursuant to s 107 of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, is not to be published.
(4) Pursuant to s 64(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, paragraphs [34] to [42] of these reasons and any confidential evidence filed with the Tribunal or given in a confidential hearing pursuant to s 107 of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, is not to be disclosed to the applicant. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – public access to government information – access to Cabinet information – reasonable grounds for claim that information is Cabinet information Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Bennison v NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet [2016] NSWCATAD 101 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Ku-ring-gai Council v NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet [2016] NSWCATAD McAdam v NSW Treasury [2014] NSWCATAD 68 McAdam v NSW Treasury [2015] NSWCATAP 61 Searle v Transport for NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 256 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, Cross on Evidence, 10th edn, Lexisnexis Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Primrose, MLC (Applicant) NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate