NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Erma Properties Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1748 Hearing dates: 1 December 2017 Decision date: 14 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: The Originating Process seeking to set aside the creditor's statutory demand served by the Defendant on 17 July 2017 be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Winding up — Statutory demand — Application to set aside –whether genuine dispute and quantum of offsetting claims sufficiently evidenced – whether demand should be set aside for substantial defect or some other reason. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Pt 5.4, ss 459G–459J - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 Cases Cited: - Beauty Health Group Ltd v Sholl [2011] NSWSC 77 - Britten-Norman Pty Ltd v Analysis & Technology Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 344; (2013) 85 NSWLR 601 - CGI Information Systems and Management Consultants Pty Ltd v APRA Consulting Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 728; (2003) 47 ACSR 100 - Douglas Aerospace Pty Ltd v Indistri Engineering Albury Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 167 - Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 - First State Computing Pty Ltd v Kyling (1995) 13 ACLC 939 - Mibor Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1994] 2 VR 290; (1993) 11 ACSR 362 - Portrait Express (Sales) Pty Ltd v Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd [1996] NSWSC 199; (1996) 20 ACSR 746 - Re Halal Meats Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 2041 - Re Morris Catering (Aust) Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ACSR 601 - Re UGL Process Solutions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1256 - Re Wollongong Coal Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1680; (2015) 110 ACSR 134 - Royal Premier Pty Ltd v Taleski [2001] WASCA 48 - Scanhill Pty Ltd v Century 21 Australasia Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 618; (1993) 12 ACSR 341 - Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 681; (1997) 76 FCR 452 - TR Administration Pty Ltd v Frank Marchetti & Sons Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 70; (2008) 66 ACSR 67 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Erma Properties Pty Limited (Plaintiff) A Plus Fire Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C P Locke (Plaintiff) B Phillips (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate