NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bezer v Bassan [2017] NSWCA 333 Hearing dates: 1 December 2017 Date of orders: 01 December 2017 Decision date: 19 December 2017 Before: Gleeson JA, Payne JA, Sackville AJA Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. Applicant to pay the costs of the appeal. 4. Note that the stay order by McCallum J on 25 August 2017 has expired. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – bias – apprehended bias – applicant sought order that primary judge disqualify herself on the basis of apprehended bias – applicant submitted witness was bullied by primary judge and that witness feared he had committed perjury as a result – whether primary judge erred in declining to disqualify herself – no ground for concluding that a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that primary judge might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the issues in the case – primary judge's interventions designed to clarify whether witness was a factual or expert witness – no complaint made by counsel at the time conduct occurred
APPEAL – whether applicant required leave to appeal – whether primary judge's refusal to disqualify herself constituted a judgment or order – whether failure to seek leave to appeal against disqualification decision precluded the issue being pressed on appeal against final judgment Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Barakat v Goritsas [2012] NSWCA 8 Bezer v Bassan (District Court, 28 August 2017, unrep) Bezer v Bassan [2017] NSWCA 214 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie (2011) 242 CLR 283; [2011] HCA 2 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Federated Engine-Drivers' and Firemen's Association of Australasia v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1911) 12 CLR 398 Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund v Saunders (1994) 52 FCR 48 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488; [2000] HCA 48 Lee v Cha [2008] NSWCA 13 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288; [1983] HCA 17 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Re Nash (No 2) [2017] HCA 52 Stone v Moore (2015) 122 SASR 54; [2015] SASC 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Bezer (Applicant) Troy Bassan (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Campbell SC / Mr D Del Monte (Applicant) Mr W Fitzsimmons / Mr M Nesbeth (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate