NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CB Australia Ltd v Shepherd [2017] NSWSC 1768 Hearing dates: 25, 26, 27 September 2017 Date of orders: 19 December 2017 Decision date: 19 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Parker J Decision: Plaintiff entitled to judgment in the sum of $856,291 by way of adjustment to the purchase price, and defendant entitled to orders for specific performance requiring plaintiff to cause company to pay $440,363.98 on account of payments received by company after completion Catchwords: Contracts – contract for sale of shares in company – construction – alleged failure to do things required at settlement of sale – whether breaches of contract – whether "completion" occurred Contracts – contract for sale of shares in company – construction – obligation to provide assistance reasonably required for the purpose of responding to claimed adjustment of purchase price – alleged breach Evidence – "without prejudice" – discussions between parties to contract concerning claims against third party – whether privileged Equity – estoppel – contract for sale of shares in company – alleged promise not to rely on time limit in contract for responding to claimed adjustment of purchase price – whether requirement of clarity satisfied Equity – specific performance – contract for sale of shares in company – assignment to third party of payments for debts owed to company – company not party to contract and in liquidation – whether purchaser can be compelled by vendor to cause company to pay third party – relief Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 131 Cases Cited: Coulls v Bagot's Executor and Trustee Co Ltd (1967) 119 CLR 460; [1967] HCA 3 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406; [1983] HCA 11 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, Cross on Evidence (10th ed, 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: CB Australia Ltd (Plaintiff) Colin William Shepherd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: AJ Bulley (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) JS Drummond (Defendant/Cross Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate