NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Poynton (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 1772 Hearing dates: 10 November 2017 Date of orders: 15 December 2017 Decision date: 15 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J - Crime Decision: Notice of Motion filed for Accused on 27 October 2017 dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for trial by Judge alone - Accused charged with two counts of murder - no issue that Accused shot dead each victim with intent to kill - trial issues involve defence of mental illness or partial defence of substantial impairment - issue concerning credibility of Accused's account given to psychiatrists - substantial impairment involves quintessential jury issue - whether in interests of justice to make order for Judge-alone trial - application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Landsman v R (2014) 88 NSWLR 543; [2014] NSWCCA 328 Potts v R (2012) 227 A Crim R 217; [2012] NSWCCA 229
R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86; 217 A Crim R 1 R v Bretherton [2013] NSWSC 1036 R v Fang (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 28 R v Haydar [2017] NSWSC 127 R v Jamal (2008) 72 NSWLR 258; [2008] NSWCCA 177 R v McNeil [2015] NSWSC 357 R v Obeid [2015] NSWSC 897 R v Poynton [2016] NSWSC 1623 R v Poynton [2016] NSWSC 615 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 R v Villalon [2013] NSWSC 1516 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Daniel Poynton (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Crespo (Crown) Mr EW Wilson SC (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate