NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Brien v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2017] NSWCA 338 Hearing dates: 1 May 2017; last submissions 26 May 2017. Decision date: 18 December 2017 Before: McColl JA at [1], Macfarlan JA at [210], Leeming JA at [227] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – fair comment at common law – where journalist plaintiff wrote articles published in The Sun Herald reporting cover-up of discovery of toxic substances at levels above health limits on land used by children as a playground – where articles illustrated by photographs of children in playground – where no tests conducted in playground area – where no discovery of such toxic substances on nearby land – where articles criticised by Media Watch programme – where plaintiff pleaded imputations of trickery and irresponsible journalism – whether Media Watch opinion based on proper material for comment
DEFAMATION – defences – honest opinion – s 31, Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)
DEFAMATION – defences – justification – whether imputations of trickery and irresponsible journalism substantially true – s 25, Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)
DEFAMATION – defences – contextual truth – whether plaintiff's reputation not further harmed by her defamatory imputations because of substantial truth of contextual imputations – s 26, Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Defamation Act 2005 (Qld) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v McBride (2001) 53 NSWLR 43; [2001] NSWCA 322 Born Brands Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 88 NSWLR 421; [2014] NSWCA 369 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock (2007) 232 CLR 245; [2007] HCA 60 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed [2010] NSWCA 335; (2010) 278 ALR 232 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Kermode (2011) 81 NSWLR 157; [2011] NSWCA 174 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Zeccola (2015) 91 NSWLR 341; [2015] NSWCA 329 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Goldsborough v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 524 Holt v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 90 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Blake (2001) 53 NSWLR 541; [2001] NSWCA 434 Magill v Magill (2006) 226 CLR 551; [2006] HCA 51 Mizikovsky v Queensland Television Ltd [2014] 1 Qd R 197; [2013] QCA 68 Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Weatherup [2017] QCA 70 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; [1992] HCA 66 Pervan v North Queensland Newspaper Co Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 309; [1993] HCA 64 Reader's Digest Services Pty Limited v Lamb (1982) 150 CLR 500; [1982] HCA 4 Webb v Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331; [1928] HCA 50 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Natalie O'Brien (Appellant) Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Smark SC; C Dibb (Appellant) P W Gray SC; M A Polden (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate