NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hopson v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 379 Hearing dates: 16 October 2017 Date of orders: 22 December 2017 Decision date: 22 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J McAteer Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the respondent is set aside other than the decision not to release the name of the Chairperson. (2) In respect of the decision under clause 1 (g) of the Table to section 14 – concerning the identity of the Chairperson, the decision is affirmed. Catchwords: GIPA Act – Whether information could reasonably be expected to have effect – Balance between public interest considerations against disclosure – General public interest in favour of disclosure of information – Open and transparent decision making – Identity of decision makers Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Police Regulation 2008 (Repealed) Police Regulation 2015 Cases Cited: Public Service Association & Professional Officers Association, Amalgamated Union (NSW) v Premier's Department [2002] NSWADT 227 Re B and Brisbane North Regional Health Authority (1994) 1 QAR 279 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Derek Hopson – Applicant Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force - Respondent Representation: Applicant: In Person Respondent: Sparke Helmore Lawyers File Number(s): 2017/00156414
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate