NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Sundararajah [2017] NSWCATOD 182 Hearing dates: 22 and 23 March 20179 September 2017 (final submissions) Date of orders: 22 December 2017 Decision date: 22 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Dr T Boland, Senior Member Dr J Ironside, Senior Member Dr C Berglund, General Member Decision: 1. Dr Sundarajah is guilty of professional misconduct.
2. Dr Sundarajah has an impairment within the meaning of s 5 of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW).
3. Dr Sundarajah is not competent to practise within the meaning of s 139(a) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW).
4. The matter is listed for a directions hearing on 24 January 2018 at 9:15 am Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES — health practitioner — whether contravention of a condition of a health practitioner's registration amounts to professional misconduct
PROFESSIONS AND TRADES — health practitioner — whether practitioner has an impairment — whether practitioner is not competent to practise Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Caladine v Health Care Complaints Commission [2007] NSWCA Forster v Hunter New England Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 106 Grant v Health Care Complaints Commission [2003] NSWCA 73 Health Care Complaints Commission v Astor-Finn [2016] NSWCATOD 73 Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield [1997] NSWSC 297; (1997) 41 NSWLR 630 Lindsay v Health Care Complaints Commission [2010] NSWCA 19 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66; (1992) 67 ALJR 170; (1992) 110 ALR 449 Prakash v HCCC [2006] NSWCA 153 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Re Dr Tan Than Le (Medical Tribunal decision, 20 September 2001 Sabag v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 411 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant ) Raahulan Sundarajah (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Raper (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate