NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: White v R [2018] NSWCCA 1 Hearing dates: 1 September 2017 Date of orders: 12 January 2018 Decision date: 12 January 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Davies J at [2] Bellew J at [103] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault – farmer on remote property – female backpacker farm worker – whether miscarriage of justice by incompetence of counsel – applicant not called to give evidence at trial – whether applicant advised of right to give evidence -applicant with cognitive and memory deficits - whether conviction was inevitable if not called – credibility issues concerning complainant – whether decision not to call applicant was a rational decision – whether Crown Prosecutor's address invited reasoning involving a reversal of onus – where complainant's credibility in issue – where address pointed to matters supporting credibility of complainant - no objection taken or application made by defence at trial – Rule 4 applies to refuse leave to raise ground on appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW) Cases Cited: Azzopardi v R (2001) 205 CLR 50; [2001] HCA 25 Brown v R [2008] NSWCCA 306 Doe v R [2008] NSWCCA 203; (2008) 187 A Crim R 328 Ignjatic v R (1993) 68 A Crim R 333 Kho v R [2012] NSWCCA 71 MB v R [2009] NSWCCA 200 Mraz v the Queen (1955) 93 CLR 493 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; 80 ALJR 614 Palmer v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 1; [1998] HCA 2 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v McLean [2001] NSWCCA 58; (2001) 121 A Crim R 484 R v Smith [1999] NSWCCA 126 R v Szabo [2000] QCA 194; (2000) 112 A Crim R 215 South v R [2007] NSWCCA 117 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leslie White (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC & J Kellaway (Appellant) D Kell SC & M Pulsford (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate