NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DAR v Children's Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 1 Hearing dates: 27 October 2017 and 29 November 2017 Date of orders: 04 January 2018 Decision date: 04 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J Anderson, Senior Member R Royer, General Member Decision: The decision of the Children's Guardian to refuse to grant the applicant a working with children check clearance is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review under section 27 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 – refusal of working with children check clearance – where applicant - where applicant charged with aggravated sexual intercourse with a child - acquittal following a criminal trial - whether the applicant poses a risk to the safety of children Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 (Repealed) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 LA v Commissioner for Children and Young People [2012] NSWSC 1454. BKE v Office of the NSW Children's Guardian [2015] NSWSC 523 BJB v Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 111 CFJ v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 62. CJT v Office of the Children's Guardian [2016] NSWSC 738 Children's Guardian v BRL [2016] NSWSC 1206 Category: Principal judgment Parties: DAR (Applicant) NSW Office of the Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Priestley (Applicant) Ms M Giacomo (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate