NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Choi v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 7 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 08 January 2018 Decision date: 08 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: (1) The respondent's costs application is to be determined without a hearing.
(2) The costs application is dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS – Whether special circumstances warrant an award of costs – Where applicant's application was frivolous or vexatious or otherwise misconceived or lacking in substance – Where applicant was self-represented and had genuine concerns – Where applicant made serious allegations of misconduct unsupported by evidence – Where applicant withdrew application at relatively early stage. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Cases Cited: CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/as The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21 Maiolo v Chiarelli (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 219 MSP Consulting and Building Constructions Pty Ltd v Karkoulas (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 183 Walker v Pittwater Council [2016] NSWCATAD 78 Category: Costs Parties: Jae Hee Choi (Applicant) University of Technology Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Flecknoe-Brown (Respondent)
Solicitors: In person (Applicant) Barry Nilsson Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00168430
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate