NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lynch v Singleton [2018] NSWLEC 1008 Hearing dates: 3 January 2018 Date of orders: 03 January 2018 Decision date: 03 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Brown C and Douglas AC Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. The respondent is to prune the hedge to a height of 3.5m above ground level between 1 March and 15 March each year. Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS] : hedge; obstruction of sunlight; loss of views Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Regulation 2007 Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides[2007] NSWLEC 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Terrance Lynch (Applicant) Mr Justin Singleton (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Lynch (Litigant in Person) (Applicant) Mr G Long, solicitor, Long Legal Pty Ltd (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/342554 Publication restriction: No
Judgment This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1. COMMISSIONERS: The applicant and his wife have owned the dwelling at 18 Pulver Street Hamilton South since 2008. The respondents' property at 248 Lawson Street shares a partial common boundary with 18 Pulver Street. The respondents have planted a row of seven lilli pilli (Syzygium luehmannii) (the trees) along that part of the shared common boundary. The height of the trees is currently around 5.5m to 6m although the height was around 2m in 2008. The trees exhibit fair to good health and vitality. A solid masonry wall of some 2.3m in height is located on the common boundary adjoining the trees.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate