NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jackson v The University of New South Wales [2018] NSWCATAD 12 Hearing dates: 6 June 2017; 23 August 2017 Date of orders: 15 January 2018 Decision date: 15 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: 1. The University has breached section 17 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998.
2. The University's decision that there were no breach of any Information Protection Principle set out in the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 is otherwise affirmed.
3. The matter is listed for a further case conference on Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 9.30 am. Catchwords: PRIVACY – Personal Information – Whether collected - Use for purpose collected – Whether use consistent with purpose collected – Whether circumstances amount to disclosure Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: AJD v Royal Prince Alfred Hospital [2014] NSWCATAD 125 BFP v NSW Ambulance Service [2015] NSWCATAD 39 CRP v Department of Family and Community Services [2017] NSWCATAD 164 CTH v University of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATAD 244 CYL v VIA [2016] NSWCATAD 314 EG v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2003] NSWADT 150 GR v Department of Housing (No. 2) (GD) [2006] NSWADT 34. KJ v Wentworth Area Health Service [2004] NSWADT 84 KO and KP v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 56 MT v Department of Education and Training [2004] NSWADT 194 NSW Police v EG; EG v NSW Police (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 10 Vice Chancellor Macquarie University v FM [2005] NSWCA 192 Vice-Chancellor, Macquarie University v FM (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 43 WL v Randwick City Council [2007] NSWADTAP 58 WL v Randwick City Council (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 84 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trevor Jackson (Applicant) The University of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Tronson (Respondent) Applicant: In Person Unrep
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate