NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aesthete No 3 Pty Limited ACN 127 464 966 v Gilmore Finance Pty Limited ACN 104 792 627 and Anor. [2018] NSWDC 1 Hearing dates: 22 June and 27 July 2017 (submissions closed 14 August 2017) Date of orders: 18 January 2018 Decision date: 18 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Wilson SC DCJ Decision: I make the following orders: (a) appeal allowed; (b) judgment for the appellant in the sum of $141,666.38; (c) that the respondents pay the costs of the proceedings in this Court and the appellant's costs before the Review Panel; (d) that the parties have liberty to apply on seven days' notice to vary the order in (c), if necessary and generally; (e) that the Exhibits be returned. Catchwords: COSTS APPEAL – by way of rehearing party/party costs whether fair and reasonable – the indemnity principle – proportionality of costs – where appellant forced by respondents' conduct to make an urgent application - where complex issues arose – where complexity confounded by evidence served but ultimately not relied upon by respondents. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Category: Costs Parties: Aesthete Pty Limited (Appellant) Gilmore Finance Pty Limited (First Respondent) Daniel Moore (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Fernon (Appellant) Mr El Hage (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate