NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Debb Investments Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 1027 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 24 January 2018 Date of orders: 25 January 2018 Decision date: 25 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Debb Investments PTY LTD ABN: 41 527 069 347 (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai City Council ABN: 86 408 856 411 (Respondent) Representation: Solicitor: Pierre Saab, Macquarie Lawyers (Applicant) Christopher Shaw, Shaw Reynolds Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/243517 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application: Drawing No. Prepared By Dated Landscape Plan – Drawing No 1/ 2 - Additional Screening Basement (Final – Revision 4) Tessa Rose 22 September 2017 Landscape Plan – Drawing No 2/ 2 - Additional Screening Ground (Final – Revision 4) Tessa Rose 22 September 2017 Architectural Plan – Proposed Site Plan DA01-E Robertson Marks 24 January 2018 Architectural Plan – Proposed External Finishes DA12-B Robertson Marks 15 May 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate