Scholefield Goodman (Australia) Pty Limited v Rutkowski [2018] NSWSC 19

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Scholefield Goodman (Australia) Pty Limited v Rutkowski [2018] NSWSC 19 Hearing dates: 10 August 2016, 25 October 2016 Date of orders: 31 January 2018 Decision date: 31 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Corrective Services NSW complete a Community Service Order Assessment;

(2) The defendant comply with all reasonable directions of Corrective Services NSW issued to facilitate the completion of the aforesaid Community Service Order Assessment;

(3) The proceedings be heard further on a date to be fixed after receipt by the Court of the aforesaid Community Service Order Assessment. Catchwords: CONTEMPT – sentence – community service a possible appropriate sentence – Community Service Order Assessment necessary and ordered. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 District Court Act 1973 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Cases Cited: AMIEU v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98; [1986] HCA 46 Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483; [1965] HCA 21 Commission for Fair Trading v Rixon (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1279 NCR Australia v Credit Connection [2005] NSWSC 1118 Paccar Financial Pty Limited v Ian Menzies & Colleen Menzies (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1622 Pang v Bydand Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 69 Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 at 476; [1988] HCA 14 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 at 530; [1995] HCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scholefield Goodman (Australia) Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Sigmund Rutkowski (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Newton/A Carr (Plaintiff) P Bolster (Defendant)