NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Noble v Phillips (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 25 Hearing dates: 2 June 2017; final supplementary submissions received on 9 January 2018 Decision date: 06 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Pleading of first matter complained of struck out with leave to re-plead; pleading as against Dr Phillips and Biolink of publication of the second matter complained of struck out; imputation 9(a) struck out; imputations 9(b) and 9(c) to go to the jury Catchwords: DEFAMATION – publication – consideration of circumstances in which separate publications may be pleaded as a single publication – disparate communications published in different forms over several days – whether open to plead as a single publication – likelihood of confusion at trial – prejudice in pleading of defences
DEFAMATION – publication – where source sued as joint publisher of newspaper article – particulars of claim both prolix and uninformative – whether capable of establishing assent or control
DEFAMATION – imputations – objections as to form and capacity – use of word "caused" – whether ambiguous Cases Cited: Age Corporation Ltd v Beran [2005] NSWCA 289 Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 Beran v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 107 Brown v Marron (Unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Steyer J, 1 December 1998) Brown v Marron [2001] WASC 100 Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651 Dank v Cronulla Sutherland District Rugby League Football Club Ltd [2014] NSWCA 288 Dank v Whitaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Bateman (2015) 90 NSWLR 79; [2015] NSWCA 154 Harris v Clayton (1881) 21 NBR 237 Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 Smyth v MacKinnon (1897) 24 LR 1086 Sonier v Breau (1912) 41 NBR 177 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Peter Bruce Noble (plaintiff) Stephen Snowden Phillips (first defendant) Biolink Pty Ltd (second defendant) Michael Slezak (third defendant) GNM Australia Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Connell (plaintiff) M Richardson (first and second defendants) R Potter (third and fourth defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate