NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Optimisation Australia Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 31 Hearing dates: 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16 March, 20 May, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22 June 2016 Date of orders: 31 January 2018 Decision date: 31 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Para 452 – plaintiff to bring in short minutes. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – members rights and remedies – oppression – closely held company 'quasi-partnership' - where majority takes excessive benefits from company – where majority dismisses minority from employment – where minority had legitimate expectation of ongoing participation – oppression established – compulsory purchase order - valuation
CORPORATIONS – officers – directors – duties – where directors remunerate majority and their personal company at uncommercial rates in excess of those agreed with minority, for no proper corporate purpose – contraventions established
EMPLOYMENT – national employment standards – where alleged agreement to accept other benefits in lieu of annual leave and personal – held, entitlements could not be excluded
EMPLOYMENT – national employment standards – – jurisdiction – whether Supreme Court has jurisdiction to entertain claim for entitlements under national employment standards – held, it does not Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 79, s 180, s 181, s 182, s 232, s 233, s 236, s 237, s 1317DA, s 1317E, s 1317H (CTH) Fair Work Act 2009, s s 16(2)(c), s 21(1)(c), s 23, s 44, s 61, s 86, s 87, s 96, s 117(3), s 119(2), s 121(1)(b), s 539, s 545 (CTH) Fair Work Regulations 2009, reg 1.09, reg 1.12. (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 146(1) (NSW) Industrial Relations Act 1996, Chap 7 Pt 2; Sch 4 Pt 18 (NSW) Industrial Relations Amendment (Industrial Court) Act 2016. Cases Cited: Australian Institute of Fitness Pty Ltd v Australian Institute of Fitness (Vic/Tas) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1639 Bright Pine Mills Pty Ltd, Re [1969] VR 1002 D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd, Re (1995) 16 ACSR 559 Diligenti v RWMD Operations Kelowna Ltd (1976) 1 BCLR 36 Dynasty Pty Ltd v Coombs (1995) 13 ACLC 1290 Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360 Ervin v Smipat Pty Ltd t/as LJ Hooker Burleigh Heads [2013] QCATA 153 ES Gordon Pty Ltd v ldameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd (1994) 15 ACSR 536 Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (1998) 28 ACSR 688 Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 672 Hogg v Dymock (1993) 11 ACSR 14 Joint v Stephens (2008) 26 ACLC 1,467; [2008] VSCA 210 Ledir Enterprises Pty Ltd, Re (2013) 96 ACSR 1 Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1986) 10 ACLR 692 Mopeke Pty Ltd v Airport Fine Foods Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 153; (2007) 61 ACSR 395 O'Neill v Phillips [1999] UKHL 24; [1999] 2 All ER 961 Optimisation Australia Pty Ltd, In the matter of [2015] NSWSC 2072 Quinn v Jack Chia (Australia) Ltd [1992] 1 VR 567 Rankin v Marine Power International Pty Ltd (2001) 107 IR 117; (2001) VSC 150 Reid v Bagot Well Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (1992) 9 ACSR 129 Roberts v Walter Developments Pty ltd (1997) 15 ACLC 882 Rogan-Gardiner v Woolworths Ltd (No 2) [2010] WASC 290 Sanford v Sanford Courier Services Pty Ltd (1986) 10 ACLR 549; 5 ACLC 394 Scottish Co-operative Society v Meyer [1959] AC 324 Short v Crawley (No 30) [2007] NSWSC 1322 Susanna Ma v Expeditors International Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 859. Thomas v H W Thomas Ltd [1984] 1 NZLR 686 Wayde v NSW Rugby League Ltd (1985) 180 CLR 459. Texts Cited: Duff & Phelps 2014 Valuation Yearbook. Hayes G (2008), A Practical Guide to Business Valuations for SMEs, 2nd ed. Ibbotson SBBI 2013 Valuation Yearbook. Pratt S, Business Valuation Discounts and Premiums. Sappideen C, O'Grady P, Warburton G & Eastman K, Macken's Law of Employment, 6th ed. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brian Kearney (P) Optimisation Australia Pty Limited (D1) Gary Williams (D2) Susan Williams (D3) Sharmark Pty Limited (D4) Orchard Office Services Pty Limited (D5) Representation: Counsel: A. Fernon (P) M.P. Cleary (Ds)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate