NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Comix (Asia) Limited v Bantex Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 47 Hearing dates: 27 November 2017 Decision date: 09 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) The plaintiff's notice of motion dated 4 July 2017 is dismissed. (2) The defendant has leave to file an amended defence by 9 March 2018. (3) That each party pay its own costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment under UCPR r 13.1(1) – whether triable issue – whether triable defence of equitable set-off – whether triable defence under s 54 of the Sale of Goods Act 1923 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Sale of Goods Act 1923 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Active Adult Management Pty Ltd v Milstern Retirement Living [2017] NSWSC 1238 Hawes v Dean [2014] NSWCA 380 Hill v Zymack (1908) 7 CLR 352; [1908] HCA 13 HP Mercantile Pty Ltd v Dierickx [2013] NSWCA 479 Lord v Direct Acceptance Corporation Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liq) (1993) 32 NSWLR 362 Morgan & Sons Ltd v S Martin Johnson & Co Ltd [1949] 1 KB 107 Rawson v Samuel (1841) Cr & Ph 161; 41 ER 451 State of New South Wales v Williams (2014) 242 A Crim R 22; [2014] NSWCA 177 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Comix (Asia) Limited (Plaintiff) Bantex Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R A Parsons (Plaintiff) Mr M Klooster (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate