NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mizuho Bank Ltd v Ackroyd (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 54 Hearing dates: 2 February 2018 Decision date: 02 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: (1) Paragraph 1 of the defendant's Notice to Produce dated 29 January 2018 be set aside. (2) Plaintiff's Amended Notice of Motion of 2 February 2018 be otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: PRATICE AND PROCEDURE – notice to produce served after disclosure of documents given – imminent trial date – defendant in effect seeking further disclosure – whether defendant should show necessity as if Practice Note SC Eq 11 applied – or whether sufficient to show relevance Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Azzi v Volvo [2006] NSWSC 283 Graphite Energy Pty Ltd v Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1326 National Employers' Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd v Waind & Hill [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Eq 11 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mizuho Bank Ltd (Plaintiff/Applicant) Mark Anthony Ackroyd (Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G E S Ng (Plaintiff/Applicant) A M Stewart SC with J C Conde (Defendant/Respondent)
Solicitors: Ashurst Australia (Plaintiff/Applicant) Thynne & Macartney (Defendant/Respondent) File Number(s): SC 2016/178533
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate