NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clark v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 83 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 February 2018 Decision date: 09 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. The plaintiff's "application" filed 11 October 2017, and notice of motion filed 27 October 2017, be dismissed;
2. The plaintiff pay the costs of the "application" filed 11 October 2017 and the notice of motion filed 27 October 2017. Catchwords: Leave to reopen – previous judgment refused leave under the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, rr 36.15, 36.16, 36.17, 36.18, 18.2 Cases Cited: AT v Commissioner of Police (NSW) (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 337 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) [1993] HCA 6; 176 CLR 300 Beckett v State of New South Wales [2013] HCA 17 Clark v State of New South Wales [2010] NSWSC 522 Clark v State of New South Wales; Clark v Robards [2014] NSWSC 742 Clark v State of NSW [2017] NSWSC 1414 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Refrigerated Roadways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 336 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Peter Frederick Clark (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) A Williams (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate