NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tam v Z5 Venture Capital Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 88 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 12 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) I note that, as no party has applied for a contrary order, order (2) made on 14 December 2017 takes effect as an order that the defendant pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings, such costs not to include directions hearings or appearances prior to 23 October 2017.
(2) Order the defendant to pay the plaintiffs' costs in the specified gross sum of $68,000. Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs in gross sum – no response to plaintiffs' evidence – appropriate to make order Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98(4) Cases Cited: Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Tam v Z5 Venture Capital Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1750 Category: Costs Parties: Siu Mei Tam (First Plaintiff) Amazing Grace Sze Family Pty Limited (ACN 607 797 017) as trustee for the Amazing Grace Sze Family Trust (Second Plaintiff) Z5 Venture Capital Pty Limited (ACN 165 882 646) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Junn (Solicitor) (Plaintiffs) B Knight (Solicitor) (Defendant)
Solicitors: Dixon Holmes Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Unsworth Legal (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/313263
Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate