NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: NB2 Pty Ltd v P.T. Ltd [2018] NSWCA 10 Hearing dates: 28 November 2017 Decision date: 14 February 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [89]; Gleeson JA at [90] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – whether respondents made representation that appellants would be the only fresh fruit and vegetable retailer in a section of the respondents' shopping centre
CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – whether failure by shopping centre's owners to disclose to an independent retailer of fresh fruit and vegetables in the centre that a supermarket had plans to engage in that activity was misleading or deceptive or constituted unconscionable conduct Legislation Cited: Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW), s 11 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 51AC, 52 Cases Cited: Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 Lam v Ausintel Investments Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 97 FLR 458 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357; [2010] HCA 31 Poseidon Ltd v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1991) 105 ALR 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NB2 Pty Ltd (First Appellant) Michael Panetta (Second Appellant) Nicholas Basile (Third Appellant) P.T. Ltd (First Respondent) Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd (Second Respondent) RE1 Ltd (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P W Gray SC / A M Hochroth (Appellants) A Fernon (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate