NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Metro North Hospital and Health Service v Pierce [2018] NSWCA 11 Hearing dates: 29 August 2017; 30 August 2017 Date of orders: 14 February 2018 Decision date: 14 February 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Payne JA at [2]; White JA at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Cross-appeal dismissed. 3. Order that the appellant pay 60 per cent of the respondent's costs of the appeal and cross-appeal. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – apportionment of responsibility and damages – medical negligence – whether pre-existing condition was progressively deteriorating – whether causation was established – whether assessment of damages could be challenged – challenges to findings of fact and damages dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld), ss 11, 57, 59(2) Workmen's Compensation Act 1932–1935 (SA) Cases Cited: Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Forst (1940) 64 CLR 538 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 EMI (Australia) Ltd v Bes [1970] 2 NSWR 238 Fernandez v Tubemakers of Australia Ltd [1975] 2 NSWLR 190 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; [1990] HCA 20 Pierce v Metro North Hospital and Health Service [2016] NSWSC 1559 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Ridolfi v Hammond [2012] NSWCA 3 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; [2000] NSWCA 29 Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v Fernandez (1976) 10 ALR 303 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Metro North Hospital and Health Service (Appellant) Emily Pierce (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Glissan ESM SC with D Nagle (Appellant) D E Graham SC with S Maybury (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate