NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stavropoulos v R [2018] NSWCCA 12 Hearing dates: 12 February 2018 Date of orders: 19 February 2018 Decision date: 19 February 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Price J at [33]; Fullerton J at [34] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supply prohibited drug and possess unauthorised and prohibited weapons – so called "Clark principle" applied by sentencing judge – error in approach of sentencing judge established – need to re-sentence – no lesser sentence warranted in law – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 93FA(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – ss 3A, 11 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5(1)(c) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) – s 166 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – ss 10(1), 25(1) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) – s 7(1) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) – s 7(1) Cases Cited: Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 R v Peter Michael Clark (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 15 March 1990, unrep) Robertson v R [2017] NSWCCA 205 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Stavropoulos – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: A Parsons – Applicant S Dowling SC – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate