NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Woods; R v Cheong [2018] NSWSC 123 Hearing dates: 7 February 2018 Date of orders: 14 February 2018 Decision date: 14 February 2018 Before: Wilson J Decision: The Notices of Motion seeking severance of the indictment are dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for separate trials – murder – accessory after murder – where principal charged with murder and applicants charged as accessories – incurable prejudice to applicants asserted if tried with principal – question of strength of the respective cases against each accused – asserted dramatic nature of the evidence – capacity of directions to address potential prejudice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Middis (unreported decision of the Supreme Court of 27 March 1991 per Hunt J) R v Verma (1987) 30 A Crim R 441 R v Assim [1966] 2 QB 249 at 261 R v Annakin & Ors (1988) 37 ACR 131 R v Baartman (unreported decision of the NSWCCA of 6 October 1994) Ross v R [2012] NSWCCA 207 R v Dellapatrona & Duffield (1993) 31 NSWLR 123 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190 R v Harpreet Singh [2012] NSWSC 869 Western Australia v Tolliday [2004] WASC 231 R v Chami; R v TS (2002) 128 A Crim R 428; [2002] NSWCCA 136 (revised 1.6.2009) R v Bikic (2000) 112 A Crim R 300; [2000] NSWCCA 106 R v Oliver (1984) 57 ALR 543 Ross v R, Darwiche & Ors v R 209 A Crim R 424; [2011] NSWCCA 62 R v Quami & Ors (no 3) [2016] NSWSC 15 R v Williams (1932) 32 SRNSW 504 Morris v Tolman [1923] 1 KB 166 R Masters (1992) 26 NSWLR 450 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Crown Andrew Woods (accused) Derek Cheong (accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Lungo (as Crown Prosecutor) Mr T Hughes (for accused Woods) Mr D Price (for accused Cheong)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate