Mao v AMP Superannuation Ltd [2018] NSWCA 20

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mao v AMP Superannuation Ltd [2018] NSWCA 20 Hearing dates: 12 February 2018 Date of orders: 12 February 2018 Decision date: 16 February 2018 Before: Simpson JA Decision: Application dismissed. Catchwords: JURISDICTION – Court of Appeal – order sought to refer matters to Royal Commission – whether Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant the orders Cases Cited: Mao v AMP Superannuation Ltd [2017] NSWSC 987 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Youhua Mao (Applicant) AMP Superannuation Ltd (First Respondent) BT Funds Management Ltd (Second Respondent) AMP Life Ltd (Third Respondent) AIA Australia Ltd (Fourth Respondent) AMP Ltd (Fifth Respondent) Westpac Banking Corporation (Sixth Respondent) TurksLegal (Seventh Respondent) James Duncan (Eighth Respondent) Colin Purdy (Ninth Respondent) Raphael Perla (Tenth Respondent) D F Villa (Eleventh Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) No appearance (Respondents) File Number(s): 2017/230266

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]