NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stojcevski v Kogan [2018] NSWSC 127 Hearing dates: 24 and 30 January 2018 Date of orders: 16 February 2018 Decision date: 16 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: (1) The plaintiff's summons is dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: APPEAL – Control of proceedings – whether plaintiff entitled to cause company to appeal
CONTRACT – Deed of company arrangement – Construction of contract – meaning of reasonable prospects of appeal succeeding – whether Senior Counsel's written advice expressed reasonable prospects of appeal succeeding – whether administrators given required access to Senior Counsel Cases Cited: Abourjaily v Parkview Estate Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1256 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Samuels v Western Australia (2005) 30 WAR 473; [2005] WASCA 193 Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 300; [2005] NSWCA 153 Degiorgio v Dunn (No 2) (2005) 62 NSWLR 284 Spencer v the Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Cranney Farm Pty Ltd v Corowa Fertilizers Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 9 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lilly Stojcevski (plaintiff) Barry Frederic Kogan (first defendant) Joseph Hayes (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Bates (plaintiff) I Pike SC (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate