NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 29) [2018] NSWSC 133 Hearing dates: 15 February 2018 Date of orders: 15 February 2018 Decision date: 15 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [27] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Procedure – Accused charged with murder – Evidence given by accomplice – Where accomplice recently charged with conspiracy to extort money from accused – Where counsel for accused sought to cross-examine witness in relation to those allegations – Where witness objected to answering questions – Whether in the interests of justice that the evidence be given – Witness compelled to give the evidence
WORDS AND PHRASES – "interests of justice" Legislation Cited: Coroners Act 2009 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Medich (No. 12) [2017] NSWSC 60 R v Ronen & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1290 Rich v Attorney General for New South Wales & Ors [2013] NSWCA 419 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92; [2013] HCA 29 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Ronald Edward Medich (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Harris and Ms G Wright (Crown) Mr W Terracini SC and Ms M Curry (Accused) Mr A Hughes (Applicant) Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions New South Wales (Crown) Colin Daley Quinn (Accused) File Number(s): 2010/356916 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate