NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Wong [2018] NSWCCA 20 Hearing dates: 7 February 2018 Date of orders: 02 March 2018 Decision date: 02 March 2018 Before: Beazley P at [1] Garling J at [2] Hidden AJ at [98] Decision: (1) Appeal upheld. (2) Quash the sentence imposed by Delaney A‑DCJ on 11 September 2017. (3) In lieu, impose upon the respondent an aggregate sentence of 4 years non-parole with a balance of term of 2 years commencing from 8 August 2016. The total sentence to expire on 7 August 2022 with a non-parole period expiring on 7 August 2020. Catchwords: CRIME – Crown appeal against sentence – supply prohibited drug – ongoing supply prohibited drug – Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 ss 25(1) and 25A – knowingly direct criminal activities of a criminal group – Crimes Act 1900 s 93T(4A) – whether aggregate sentence manifestly inadequate – whether sentencing Judge erred in failing to give adequate weight to general deterrence – whether sentence reflected additional criminality of offence on Form 1 – whether sentencing Judge erred in failing to appropriately accumulate multiple offences – whether sentencing Judge erred in extent of statutory variation of head sentence to non-parole period ratio – appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Brown v R [2010] NSWCCA 73 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44; (1977) 137 CLR 293 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Nguyen v The Queen [2016] HCA 17; (2016) 256 CLR 656 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 PD v R [2012] NSWCCA 242 R v AB [2017] NSWCCA R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Burns [2007] NSWCCA 228 R v Cahill [2015] NSWCCA 53 R v GWM [2012] NSWCCA 240 R v Pickett [2010] NSWCCA 273 R v Rae [2013] NSWCCA 9 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; 126 A Crim R 525 Way v R [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Kevin Yeh Wong (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Adams (Crown) H Dhanji SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate