NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Slade v Kempsey Shire Council [2018] NSWCA 25 Hearing dates: 17 November 2017 Decision date: 23 February 2018 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; Barrett AJA at [38] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Environment Protection Agency (EPA) issued a clean-up notice to the appellants in respect of a metal recycling site – appellants failed to comply with the notice – EPA then issued a notice to the respondent council to clean up the site – whether any non-compliance by the respondent with the EPA's notice to it affected the respondent's right to recover its costs and expenses of the clean-up from the appellants Legislation Cited: Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW), ss 91, 92, 104, 105, 110 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 58(1) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(e) Cases Cited: Agricultural & Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd (2002) 209 CLR 478; [2002] HCA 22 O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 232; [1991] HCA 14 Shepherd v Felt and Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359; [1931] HCA 21 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Phillip Slade (First Appellant) Barry Phillip Slade (Second Appellant) Kempsey Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented Appellants M W E Maconachie (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate