NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cliff (No 5) [2018] NSWSC 166 Hearing dates: 21 February 2018 Date of orders: 21 February 2018 Decision date: 21 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) Crown may rely upon evidence of post-offending conduct as evidence of guilt;
(2) Partial defence of extreme provocation will be left for the consideration of the jury Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – ruling on post-offending conduct as evidence of consciousness of guilt - extreme provocation - self defence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23 Cases Cited: Blackwell v R [2011] NSWCCA 93: 208 A Crim R 392 Bullard v The Queen, [1957] AC 635 Gammage v The Queen (1969) 122 CLR 444; [1969] HCA 68 James v The Queen [2014] HCA 6; (2014) 253 CLR 475 Masciantonio v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 58 Penza v R [2013] NSWCCA 21 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 R v Ciantar (2006) 16 VR 26; (2006) VSCA 263 R v Fowler [2003] NSWCCA 321 R v Heyes (2006) 12 VR 401; [2006] VSCA 86 R v Hill [1986] 1 SCR 313 R v Sievers [2004] NSWCCA 463; 151 A Crim R 426 Steer v R [2008] NSWCCA 295; 191 A Crim R 435 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Bryce Cliff (Accused) Representation: Counsel: M Pincott (Crown) E Wilson SC (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate